<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Naomi Campbell: &#8216;PETA Went Too Far&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sayswholive.com/2007/09/13/naomi-campbell-peta-went-too-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sayswholive.com/2007/09/13/naomi-campbell-peta-went-too-far/</link>
	<description>Daily Music delivered: music, video, audio, concerts,songs, photos, news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:58:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrity full frontal assaults: do they draw you in or turn you off? &#124; Fishing Vacation</title>
		<link>http://sayswholive.com/2007/09/13/naomi-campbell-peta-went-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-11694</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrity full frontal assaults: do they draw you in or turn you off? &#124; Fishing Vacation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sayswholive.com/2007/09/13/naomi-campbell-peta-went-too-far/#comment-11694</guid>
		<description>[...] But clearly the producers wanted to make a bigger splash. Hence a naked Greta. And a naked Emillia Fox and a naked Richard E Grant and a rather less appetising naked Terry Gilliam, all of them clutching something from the deep. Of course the use of nudity to draw attention to a cause is nothing new; PETA did it with Naomi Campbell and fur. Before Naomi decided she liked fur after all. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But clearly the producers wanted to make a bigger splash. Hence a naked Greta. And a naked Emillia Fox and a naked Richard E Grant and a rather less appetising naked Terry Gilliam, all of them clutching something from the deep. Of course the use of nudity to draw attention to a cause is nothing new; PETA did it with Naomi Campbell and fur. Before Naomi decided she liked fur after all. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: End of the Line: a full frontal assault on overfishing &#124; Fishing Vacation</title>
		<link>http://sayswholive.com/2007/09/13/naomi-campbell-peta-went-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-11678</link>
		<dc:creator>End of the Line: a full frontal assault on overfishing &#124; Fishing Vacation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sayswholive.com/2007/09/13/naomi-campbell-peta-went-too-far/#comment-11678</guid>
		<description>[...] But clearly the producers wanted to make a bigger splash. Hence a naked Greta. And a naked Emillia Fox and a naked Richard E Grant and a rather less appetising naked Terry Gilliam, all of them clutching something from the deep. Of course the use of nudity to draw attention to a cause is nothing new; PETA did it with Naomi Campbell and fur. Before Naomi decided she liked fur after all. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But clearly the producers wanted to make a bigger splash. Hence a naked Greta. And a naked Emillia Fox and a naked Richard E Grant and a rather less appetising naked Terry Gilliam, all of them clutching something from the deep. Of course the use of nudity to draw attention to a cause is nothing new; PETA did it with Naomi Campbell and fur. Before Naomi decided she liked fur after all. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
